From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: Automatic indentation of org tree Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:41:21 +0800 Message-ID: <87ab2ogi66.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <871vo1agq1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r5w13taq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MW1uw-0006HT-C8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:41:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MW1ur-0006C8-Dg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:41:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52534 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MW1ur-0006B0-5Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:41:29 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.245]:52581) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MW1up-0006v7-Qv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:41:28 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so297225rvb.6 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:41:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (User's message of "Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:32:49 +0000 (UTC)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: User Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org User writes: > Bastien googlemail.com> writes: >> >> I tested your code but there are several problems: it is not usable on >> big files, > > The size of the file shouldn't matter, since only lines in the > current window are indented. Probably, some trivial bug remained > in it which my tests didn't cover. Okay. >> and even on small files the auto-indentation is confusing. >> For example, stars get indented while there should not. > > It's a matter of taste. I didn't find it confusing. But it's > trivial to change it to avoid indenting header lines. "Confusing" was a polite version of "buggy" :) >> I guess this is still work-in-progress -- hope you'll find ways >> to fix the problems above! > > It's a proof-of-concept package, but I think the underlining > concept is solid. If someone motivated spends a little time on it > then I'm sure the problems can be ironed out quickly. As you already guessed, I try to make *you* spend a little more time on it :) Because I think the idea is nice and the code can be useful. -- Bastien