From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix renumbering for footnotes at BOL. Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:51:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87aa9nk1n9.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87ehyzk8n5.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <877h4rh8z2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9F92-0005Tz-LD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:51:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9F91-0002CH-HT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:51:16 -0400 Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]:39673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9F91-0002C8-Cu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:51:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877h4rh8z2.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:41:05 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > It looks like the original function isn't right in more than one way > (it doesn't even make sure the matched string is really a > footnote). But that's another topic. Yes, indeed. > About your patch, I have but one question: I don't get a situation in > which the assert would be triggered, may you give me such an example? I don't either, and that's a good thing. I added that just as some extra paranoia so that you get an error if a footnote gets broken. Bye, Tassilo