From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Maus Subject: Re: [dev] Implement "ref" link types Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 06:14:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87aa4csr86.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> References: <87vcn2vgq7.fsf@gmail.com> <8739a62upy.fsf@gmail.com> <763A8736-3DB8-492D-95CB-2E2D90982BAE@gmail.com> <87y5rx22km.fsf@gmail.com> <87ty2l17o7.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Feb_21_06:14:13_2012-1"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rzi3T-0001l4-5a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:14:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rzi3R-0004RW-O9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:14:23 -0500 Received: from app1a.xlhost.de ([213.202.242.161]:49040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rzi3R-0004RC-Jc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:14:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ty2l17o7.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org Mode List , Carsten Dominik --pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Feb_21_06:14:13_2012-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII At Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:06:32 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Completing myself, here is a patch implementing the previous suggestion, > along with example output obtained with it. You may need to > (fmakunbound 'org-e-ascii-target) to avoid an error, since this patch > removes the function. I don't see why we should drop the link type in fuzzy links. After all they /are/ are special type of link. Without the link type we will run into trouble, won't we?. In the example file: ,---- | We end the list at item [[itm:last]]. `---- So, itm:last is a fuzzy link but it could as well be a "regular" link of type "itm" with a path component of "last" and no description. If we say that we use itm:last as a fuzzy link iff there is no registered link type "itm" we might put people into trouble if in some point in the future Org mode introduces a link of type "itm" and the fuzzy links stop working. Or is there any technical reason to use [[itm:last]] instead of [[ref:itm:last]]? Best, -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de --pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Feb_21_06:14:13_2012-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EABEIAAYFAk9DKCkACgkQDMLgk1Evc4WvDgD9E5D1YJLP0kQWlzybLMNLXQ/q 7flOBA10LBzZqFaBFGYBAIvosxg9HHRXBAPAkBhpt83g/50zZK/dzGPPm0i3b6yD =T43O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Tue_Feb_21_06:14:13_2012-1--