From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: org-yank improvement?
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:38:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87aa2iai44.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87ipikr0r0.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca>
	<8762ekiehm.fsf@mean.albasani.net> <87fwdo4bf1.fsf@googlemail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57805)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SHrAi-0004uE-W8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:36:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SHrAh-00044a-9S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:36:52 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:42736)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SHrAh-00044R-02
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:36:51 -0400
Received: by werj55 with SMTP id j55so427899wer.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87fwdo4bf1.fsf@googlemail.com> (Thorsten's message of "Sun, 04
	Mar 2012 16:45:54 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Thorsten <quintfall@googlemail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Thorsten,

Thorsten <quintfall@googlemail.com> writes:

> Memnon Anon <gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
>
>>> However, by mistake, it happens that the cursor is on the only visible
>>> bullet star of the next heading  instead of really being at the start
>>> of the line. 
>
> I recently edited some org files in clean mode for the first time (It
> might be the default mode on Worg?) and was surprised and a bit confused
> that my cursor(point) was invisible when on the invisible bullet stars
> at the beginning of the line. 
> I had to move point to the (only) visible bullet star on the line to find out
> where I am in the buffer. Maybe only a peculiarity of my color-settings,
> but nevertheless convincing me not to use clean mode. 

Then we should fix org-indent.el accordingly.

(Please avoid "Clean mode" as a way to refer to org-indent, it suggests
other views are not clean!  Maybe the doc should be updated wrt this.)

I must confess I'm not a user of org-indent.  I have been testing it a
few times and always had the feeling it goes against Org's "What You See
is What You Have" core principle.  But let's fix bugs in it anyway.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien