From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] Capture: Expand keyword within %(SEXP) in template Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:11:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9v0hz7j.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1351848001-11636-1-git-send-email-ryo.takaishi.0@gmail.com> <87ip9oi5qt.fsf@gmail.com> <878vak9kib.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUI1z-00040M-O0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:15:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUI1v-0005W0-NX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:15:31 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:48177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUI1v-0005Vo-Hm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:15:27 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u3so1923384wey.0 for ; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 07:15:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878vak9kib.fsf@gmail.com> (Ryo TAKAISHI's message of "Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:55:56 +0900") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ryo TAKAISHI Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Ryo TAKAISHI writes: > I did'nt come up with to use it. > But "%(func %:description)" or "%(func (plist-get org-store-link-plist :description))", I think the former is readble template than the latter. Probably, but it's also more error-prone. For example, your code operates only at top-level, i.e. it won't handle something like: %(fun arg1 (sub-fun %:description)) It will also error out if any atom isn't a symbol, i.e.: %(format "%d" 1) It's all about pro and cons. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou