From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [patch] ox-koma-letter Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:48:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9qpem9n.fsf@pank.iue.private> References: <87vc9gkund.fsf@pank.eu> <20130226123819.GQ24632@strey.biz> <87mwuqg4ln.fsf@pank.iue.private> <20130227105102.GV24632@strey.biz> <87wqtudkey.fsf@pank.iue.private> <86bob550wv.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58651) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAkBL-0001mu-Ty for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:48:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAkBA-0007TW-67 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:48:34 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAkB9-0007RA-W6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:48:28 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UAkBI-0003WS-C4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:48:36 +0100 Received: from 192.167.90.132 ([192.167.90.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:48:36 +0100 Received: from rasmus by 192.167.90.132 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:48:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86bob550wv.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:41:52 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi, > > Rasmus wrote: >>> Maybe we should write a user guide *before* further implementation >>> steps. >> >> I agree. A "question zero" is whether we eventually want to have an >> org-letter which could, in principle, output to something different >> than scrlttr2. > > That could be "isodoc" for which I have a bit of experience > with. I'd enjoy to try and plug it in the current "org-letter" > implementation. True. And it even produces beautiful documents, as far as I remember. There's even the standard LaTeX letter class. Say we define a variable ORG_LETTER_X. Then we'd need a table of corresponding values in export type Y. Probably this would be easiest to do in terms of the export function. –Rasmus -- Don't panic!!!