From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: are babel python sessions and inlined images incompatible?
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 00:13:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87a9olrldp.fsf@pank.eu>
References: <ybi7gjtkhtr.wl%ramestica@lavabit.com> <8738uhmget.fsf@gmail.com>
	<ybizjwoevss.wl%ramestica@lavabit.com>
	<86ehdzzlih.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<ybik3nry05j.wl%ramestica@lavabit.com> <86r4hzgisn.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<m138uefueg.fsf@poto.westell.com> <86bo911l7j.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52448)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UVqtb-0000Qg-E6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:13:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UVqta-0003XX-Hj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:13:35 -0400
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50386)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UVqta-0003XT-Bm
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:13:34 -0400
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1UVqtU-0006gg-KC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 00:13:28 +0200
Received: from 188-176-96-104-dynamic.dk.customer.tdc.net ([188.176.96.104])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 00:13:28 +0200
Received: from rasmus by 188-176-96-104-dynamic.dk.customer.tdc.net with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 00:13:28 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news@mygooglest.com>
writes:

> As you say, I guess that one could copy/paste the code from maxima, octave or
> R to get the desired results.
>
> Would we want to abstract the above, I guess we should generalize the
> languages families as:
>
> - Graphics-only languages (ditaa, dot, gnuplot, etc.)
>
> - General-purpose languages with graphical capacities (R, maxima, octave...
>   And, at least, python[1] IIUC)

Python features very sophisticated graphics through matplotlib (at
least on par with R/ggplot2).

> - General-purpose languages without graphical capacities (sql, sh, etc.)

Sounds like a good idea to me.  I don't know whether it would save a
lot of effort though or make it easier to get functions spread out?

–Rasmus

-- 
When in doubt, do it!