From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Alan Dorman Subject: Re: org-blog 0.9 release Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 08:30:11 -0400 Message-ID: <87a9nkef1o.fsf@ironicdesign.com> References: <8761zfhgcz.fsf@ironicdesign.com> <87ehdrtn5i.fsf@gmail.com> <8738u7ynz9.fsf@ironicdesign.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39992) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufr8X-0000eg-0Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 08:30:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufr8R-0001eh-4D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 08:30:20 -0400 Received: from ophelia.ironicdesign.com ([206.166.194.242]:38904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufr8Q-0001eJ-VW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 08:30:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Matt Price's message of "Thu, 23 May 2013 19:48:10 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Price Cc: Rafael , emacs-orgmode Matt Price writes: > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Puneeth Chaganti wrote: >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Michael Alan Dorman >>> If you don't mind, I will start looking at the org2blog code and seeing >>> how cleanly I can implement these additional capabilities as handlers or >>> filters for the exporter---and then maybe we could look for that >>> back-end to live in contrib, and both our codebases could take advantage >>> of it? >> >> That seems like a good plan. I've been meaning to get this going for >> some time, but have been quite busy off-late. I'll try to make some >> time for it, soon. > > Was there ever any progress on this? I code so slowly I'd not likely > be much help with the actual implementation but would be happy to pull > from git and do some testing if that's of any use. Well, it's not an ex-parrot---which is to say, I still have the intention to work on it---but 1) my $DAYJOB has gotten busy, and 2) with many of the additional features being Wordpress-specific, it demands that I do some significant refactoring of my code for me to do it in a way that doesn't tie the whole thing to Wordpress. That said: Puneeth, it seems like most of your additional features are currently implemented as post-processing bits---could you just grab the new-exporter-based code that I have now and use that? It's not an all-singing, all-dancing solution, but it might get your users able to use 8.0 sooner. Mike.