From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: tag groups Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 16:04:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87a9m3pwo5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87obbz5ct7.fsf@lonovo.maison.ici> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuNfM-0001K8-Ha for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:04:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuNfK-0000wU-T7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:04:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]:45524) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuNfK-0000w7-Lw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:04:14 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e11so158604wgh.6 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87obbz5ct7.fsf@lonovo.maison.ici> (Maurice's message of "Sat, 25 May 2013 16:55:32 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Maurice Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Maurice, Maurice writes: > value for : org-tag-alist-for-agenda > > ((:startgroup) > ("prêté" . 112) > ("emprunté" . 101) > (:endgroup) > ("note" . 110) > ("noexport" . 120) > ("lien" . 98) > ("crypt" . 99) > ("projet" . 112) > ("suspendu" . 122) > (:startgroup "lieu") > ("@dehors" . 100) > (:grouptags) > ("@lieu1" . 97) > ("@lieu2" . 118)) You're missing an :endgroup here -- that's weird. > org-tag-groups-alist > org-tag-groups-alist-for-agenda > > keep their original value : nil > > If I filter by tag @dehors, I do not get the new filter by tags > @dehors or @lieu1 or @lieu2. I just fixed a bug wrt to handling the "@" character in tags. Can you pull from the git repo and report if you still have the issue you reported? If so, please add an example I can quickly use to reproduce the problem. Thanks! -- Bastien