From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [proposal] org-test: Embedded self-tests in orgmode files
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 20:42:23 +0200
Message-ID: <87a9l73kvk.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CAMqXDZs4B6qbq0c98yh5ZAOd4jfTHefHZAAGuBXhQ7h3y7AQ1w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33055)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1V3AlB-0004zU-Lx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:06:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1V3Akl-0004uU-8D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:06:17 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]:38712)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1V39RU-00055j-K6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:42:12 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id l18so3711680wgh.11
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMqXDZs4B6qbq0c98yh5ZAOd4jfTHefHZAAGuBXhQ7h3y7AQ1w@mail.gmail.com>
	(Daniel Hackney's message of "Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:32:04 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Daniel Hackney <dan@haxney.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Daniel Hackney <dan@haxney.org> writes:

> After finding that =fill-paragraph= has regressed again, 

Would you mind elaborating on that? I could have overlooked the problem.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou