From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [RFC] Move ox-koma-letter into core? Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:17:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9e1vj56.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <878uueciku.fsf@gmail.com> <55F46D73-2430-4831-ABE9-D66AE03647E7@gmail.com> <874n50cdnu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvo91ogy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <874n4mevxx.fsf@gmail.com> <87iot26g40.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878utn1a7q.fsf@gmail.com> <871tzf9p2g.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqh6zw8t.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7md-0004Od-Hd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:17:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7mX-0006uQ-HO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:17:23 -0500 Received: from rs249.mailgun.us ([209.61.151.249]:42349) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC7mX-0006uK-9t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 08:17:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wqh6zw8t.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:08:18 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Alan Schmitt , Org Mode List , Carsten Dominik Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> If you're fine with this, I'll raise the topic on both emacs-devel >> and this list. > > I suggested this idea because I thought it was a good one. The very fact > that we're still discussing it proves that it isn't as obvious as > I initially thought. That's fine with me. Let me state it clearly: I'm not against including ox-koma-letter.el in Org's core (then in Emacs), I actually think it is a good addition (once documented, that is.) My suggestion is to ask Emacs maintainers about the general policy regarding new Org/Emacs exporters. Chances are that they will blindly trust us, which I'm fine with. If they have a different opinion, it's better to hear it now than when we do the merge. Also remember I *removed* some exporters and other files from Org's core when releasing 8.0, because I wanted to draw a clearer line: the current rule is "If an Org feature relies on something that is not part of Emacs or not part of a standard GNU system, don't include it into core." That's why ox-freemind.el and org-mew.el new lives in contrib/, for example. For those features, GNU ELPA or some other packages archive (I'm not insisting on Org ELPA) is a the way to go IMO. But let's not revisit this, it's a separate issue. -- Bastien