From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bug: \uline produced inside \section in latex export [8.2.5h (8.2.5h-30-gdd810b-elpa @ /home/user/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20140303/)] Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:03:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9cio06v.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ior7qzua.fsf@slumpy.org> <87fvmbktzz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3bmoe3o.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppleiqo6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <874n2qo4zh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ob0ysbh8.fsf@slumpy.org> <87vbv6mmrt.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRLZz-0004GY-S2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:03:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRLZt-00048T-To for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:03:15 -0400 Received: from rs249.mailgun.us ([209.61.151.249]:58878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRLZt-00048B-M1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:03:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87vbv6mmrt.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:38:14 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Konstantin Kliakhandler Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > It is technically possible to use \underline (hard-coded) in sections > and \uline (or whatever is defined in`org-latex-text-markup-alist') > everywhere else. > > Is there any downside to this proposal? I don't know but it looks good to me, because the shortcomings of \underline not being able to wrap are not a problem for sections. -- Bastien