From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Hidden named blocks.
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:42:59 +0100
Message-ID: <87a94jdmss.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <544CC86A.9000601@thierry-pelle.eu>
	<87egtvdtgj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <544CD18B.4090106@thierry-pelle.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50580)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XiN9I-0000m0-Ga
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:42:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XiN9A-0004Gz-GC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:42:20 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:50904)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XiN9A-0004Ep-9q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:42:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <544CD18B.4090106@thierry-pelle.eu>
	(abonnements@thierry-pelle.eu's message of "Sun, 26 Oct 2014 11:48:43
	+0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: abonnements <abonnements@thierry-pelle.eu>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

abonnements <abonnements@thierry-pelle.eu> writes:

> Thanks, that's what I supposed.
>
> But when you hit "TAB" on a "#+name: " line it fold the block to the
> "#+end_XXX".
> This is not the case for a "#+header:" line.

I think you're using an outdated Org.

> So such a folding stuff may be easy to implement no?

As I wrote already, it would be confusing. The current behaviour (in
a recent Org) makes more sense.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou