From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Warning about section named "Footnotes" Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:31:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87a93annfi.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xui6X-0003aD-EV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 08:30:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xui6P-0007rp-Vh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 08:30:29 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:49265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xui6P-0007ri-PY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 08:30:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Arni Magnusson's message of "Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:04:40 +0000 (GMT)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Arni Magnusson Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Arni Magnusson writes: > I was using Org to write a software manual with a structure along the > lines of: > > > * Equations > > How to write equations in software FOO. > > * Footnotes > > How to write footnotes in software FOO. > > * Images > > How to insert images in software FOO. > > > When I exported the document (to LaTeX and HTML), I was puzzled to > find that one of the sections was not exported at all... > > After investigating the problem for a while, I realized that if > a section is named "Footnotes" the default behavior of Org is to > ignore it silently. > > My solution was to set `org-footnote-section' to nil. > > > I think it would help Org users if: > > 1. Org export (to LaTeX, HTML, etc.) emits an error or a prominent warning > when it ignores an entire section like this. It shouldn't. This is the expected behaviour. > 2. The manual would warn the user about this behavior with a prominent > warning. Would you mind suggesting a change to the manual? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou