From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: ODT export: Issues with `org-export-footnote-first-reference-p'
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:28:20 +0100
Message-ID: <87a90lxxqj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <mbcpd7$lp0$1@ger.gmane.org> <m2lhk5lyb4.fsf@christianmoe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45122)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YLIL0-0006EF-7B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:27:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YLIKx-0003UU-1K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:27:18 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:36041)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YLIKw-0003U4-Rd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:27:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m2lhk5lyb4.fsf@christianmoe.com> (Christian Moe's message of
	"Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:56:47 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Cc: Vaidheeswaran <vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com> writes:

> An ODT cross-reference to the footnote? That makes sense, but should
> that be achieved by footnoting inside a footnote, or is the appropriate
> thing to do to use a dedicated target and link?
>
>   [fn:1] footdef1, see also [[thatotherfootnote]].
>
>   [fn:2] <<thatotherfootnote>>footdef2
>
> That seems to works nicely e.g. in HTML export.
>
> But I get an error message when I try it in ODT export (OpenDocument
> export failed: number-or-marker-p, nil -- can't be more detailed at the
> moment because my debugger doesn't seem to work correctly).

This should be fixed. Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou