From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [bug] TODO [/] cookie not updating if list has inline task
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 20:28:15 +0100
Message-ID: <87a8x3uhps.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <877fs75tzk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r3qfgvm4.fsf@gmx.us>
	<877fs782c3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35373)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Yu4Ec-00066q-7j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2015 15:28:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Yu4EX-0005G9-NY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2015 15:28:26 -0400
Received: from mail-db3on0111.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([157.55.234.111]:51645
	helo=emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Yu4EX-0005Fo-Fs
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2015 15:28:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <877fs782c3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Sun, 17 May 2015 20:51:24 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 20:51, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:

[...]

> Anyway, we could fix it in another way. Eric's example,
>
>   - [ ] the first task
>     
>   *************** This is something to note
>   *************** END
>
>   - [ ] another list of tasks
>
> is misleading because it's really the same list, i.e., inlinetasks are
> allowed in items, so "This is something to note" belongs to "the first
> task".

I'm not sure I understand what is misleading about the above?  The note
is indeed intended to belong to the first item on the list.

> So, our option is to simply dis-allow inlinetasks in plain lists. That
> would also solve the issue.

I wouldn't be too keen on this option at the moment.  I use inline tasks
in lists all the time.

However, we are starting to see that inline tasks are indeed a bit of
kludge and impact on org structures significantly so maybe we can remove
this capability once inline annotations, as discussed in another thread,
are implemented?

Thanks,
eric

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.1, Org release_8.3beta-1147-g0e5069