From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: Orgalist notes Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 10:34:38 -0400 Message-ID: <87a7tcsvi9.fsf@norang.ca> References: <871ses9vg4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lgd0ezli.fsf@gmail.com> <87bmdv9awd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874ljmnxjv.fsf@len.workgroup> <87r2mqclm8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sh754q02.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47997) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFKkY-0000zC-Ux for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 10:34:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFKkU-000255-VN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 10:34:54 -0400 Received: from pmta2.delivery6.ore.mailhop.org ([54.200.129.228]:62464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFKkU-00022t-PK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 10:34:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sh754q02.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 05 May 2018 16:55:09 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Abrahamsen writes: > And, as always, thank you! This is fairly heroic work -- I say that > after having made an attempt at orgstruct-mode, and run away screaming. > And look, no funny indentation! > > - Yet a list item with a ridiculous amount of text in it does not wrap > into a second list item. > - Neither does the second list item, despite having an equivalent amount > of spurious typing in it. > > - And before I get tired of the experiment, here's the same thing with > a numbered list. > - Oh damn, I hit M-RET, and the numbered list turned into an unnumbered > list. > > No good deed goes unpunished :) I think you need 2 blank lines between the lists to separate them by default - otherwise they are treated as one list and the first bullet defines the type of list (and therefore changes your 1. back to - Regards, Bernt