From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: Add option to fontify latex blocks [9.1.9
 (release_9.1.9-65-g5e4542 @
 /home/carlos/local/stow/emacs-26/share/emacs/26.1.50/lisp/org/)]
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 17:46:26 +0100
Message-ID: <87a7kkz5p9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87h8g2kv81.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhe0jQTb7At0BaHGOOuRVYBeDpmgpCkX8OfdZT9KVOBwvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87lg5ershk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAELgYhcDvkvur0LYh0aKn4AsSf9zWzX9PJ_Jc=8GQAiOYu-KmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87d0qpsc4g.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAELgYhdQSNgiOuE4OCebm8u8bB-8s_4VOcE3JbEA7q4t_ksaPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhe+nWvo7MQEEjHsm+vXqT_dCo6jOeVqyMafjTvfEcYT1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhcf_gZdj_z5ixjxwEHupE+C+F5Ktj_a73sXY=G42R9YzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhdrFy2W_BdYOH9TUvawsVy1JY=wgHUsu4AZ8xnmkGTLvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhcyyjFPGNT7ZN7H4Xyisok1U5RZrFK9DtrF1wNchy7o_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhcSzFh+_-_gD1uCju3pG1BRw7ZLKxYqfVJyR5PvESH+_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhcdHyYJrxQ5EXQhAqPmJHrsu2-jnfPROcN6CuF=6Y3NHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87woo5xkgf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAELgYhesRfV1=wdF0xDv3vf_rmRh-N1eso5Pbpr0oFQfAqJxrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhd8e6UE2-BHKmMzGV+6crX_2sePTsmkZeKyk=45pCoNHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYheA4jz6+rvr284UDofRrGUBaV+aPUBzWc43PkMoNW7mYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhfQYSN7C96-feO6x=v4-d2HESePTqW5bcHjUy7oBRgMoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhfF849mLfrYZ8bO8WcAj7H7W3h+gJLeCSSY_iAnABZhaw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k1k2ynsh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAELgYheNETq5DFnKh99hJRUAZpLNhzUnMPSpv=rfWQRZqhgfvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAELgYhdcW1XnR7BTmos6vAF_YPJ4Wdp=3FEAhBEYfeA4B2nvSw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53970)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1geNBh-0005Xy-Eu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 11:46:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1geNBe-0008QP-Ar
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 11:46:41 -0500
Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:47995)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1geNBe-0008Lq-4w
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 11:46:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAELgYhdcW1XnR7BTmos6vAF_YPJ4Wdp=3FEAhBEYfeA4B2nvSw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Carlos Pita's message of "Sat, 22 Dec 2018 12:07:08 -0300")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Carlos Pita <carlosjosepita@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Carlos Pita <carlosjosepita@gmail.com> writes:

> Here is a patch on top of latest revision. It just adds an extension
> function while initializing font locking, as documented in [1]. It
> indeed reduces lines of code to some extent by moving the dirty stuff
> out of the fontification function (but I tried to keep the code
> formatting of your last commit, since it was rather different than the
> one shipped with emacs). The approach is more robust AFAICS since the
> font locking framework is correctly informed of which blocks should be
> refontified before fontification itself happens. It covers all types
> of blocks: #+BEGIN/#+END, \begin\end, \[\]. It's not a full parser but
> at least it matches corresponding delimiters by type by using a simple
> heuristic.

I still think it is not a good long-term solution for fontification. I'd
rather see work to integrate fontification with the parser.

Meanwhile, I applied your patch in master. I also added a commit
message.

Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou