From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: Bug: Agenda fails to parse time interval like 23:00-29:00 [9.1.9 (release_9.1.9-65-g5e4542 @ /home/yantar92/.emacs.d/straight/build/org/)] Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 00:24:31 +0800 Message-ID: <87a784hznk.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87eexnxwza.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87pnh0un8u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35113) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idcuY-0004GC-C0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 11:26:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idcuX-0007ss-9c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 11:26:26 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::434]:35555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idcuX-0007se-3Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 11:26:25 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id g17so11219025wro.2 for ; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 08:26:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87pnh0un8u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > What makes you think the time interval above is correct? I would also > expect an error from that time specification. I also thought that it is incorrect (and posted a bug report since it is what is produced by typing 11pm+6 in org-read-date). However, I got a reply that 23:00-29:00 is a valid time interval format [1]. Best, Ihor [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2019-07/msg00039.html Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > 'Ihor Radchenko' writes: > >> I have one scheduled item like the following: >> >> * test >> <2019-12-05 Thu 23:00-29:00> >> >> This kind of item fails to be parsed by agenda because of incorrect >> treatment of 23:00-29:00 time interval > > What makes you think the time interval above is correct? I would also > expect an error from that time specification. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou