emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Matt Huszagh <huszaghmatt@gmail.com>,
	emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Supported Emacs version
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:12:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6hw7lxb.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lf1glo8h.fsf@gnu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1373 bytes --]

Hi  Bastien,

>> I’m tempted to make some patches to remove all the Emacs < 26
>> compatibility code if we no longer need it. What do you think?
> We should NOT remove this code: many people probably use/need it.
> Anything that helps keeping Org compatible with Emacs < 26 is
> still useful, the more compatible the better.
> If for some reason, some backward-compatibility code becomes too
> difficult to maintain then perhaps yes we can remove it, but not
> before.

Hmm, I’m not entirely sure what to think here. On one hand, I very much agree
with you that it’s better if Org is compatible with older versions just by
having a bit of extra code left in org-compat.el. However, if many bits of Org
use Emacs 24/25/26 functions that /aren’t/ covered in org-compat.el (as I think is
currently the case) that leads to bits of Org that are covered by org-compat.el
and bits that aren’t, and so I imagine this currently produces inconsistently
buggy behaviour in old versions of Emacs.

If this were just a question of fully supporting older Emacs versions at no
extra cost, I’d be inclined to respond as you have, but I think the problem we
really have is whether it’s better to provide /partial/ support for older versions
of Emacs? Personally I’m more inclined towards an all-or-nothing approach.

All the best,

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-22  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-21 18:41 [PATCH] Fix window width when line numbers present Matt Huszagh
2021-11-21 19:14 ` Timothy
2021-11-21 21:08   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2021-11-21 21:14     ` Matt Huszagh
2021-11-21 21:16       ` Bastien
2021-11-21 21:22         ` Matt Huszagh
2021-11-22  5:14           ` Bastien
2021-11-22  5:31             ` Timothy
2021-11-22  5:44               ` Bastien
2021-11-22  5:51                 ` Supported Emacs version (was: [PATCH] Fix window width when line numbers present) Timothy
2021-11-22  6:05                   ` Supported Emacs version Bastien
2021-11-22  6:12                     ` Timothy [this message]
2021-11-22  6:39                       ` Bastien
2021-11-22  8:04                         ` Timothy
2021-11-22 10:26                           ` Bastien
2021-11-22 11:55                 ` [PATCH] Fix window width when line numbers present Ihor Radchenko
2021-11-22 12:40                   ` Tim Cross
2021-11-23  5:59                   ` Bastien
2021-11-23  7:05                     ` Tim Cross
2021-11-22  3:16     ` Timothy
2021-11-21 19:19 ` Timothy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a6hw7lxb.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=tecosaur@gmail.com \
    --cc=bzg@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=huszaghmatt@gmail.com \
    --cc=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --subject='Re: Supported Emacs version' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).