From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id cGsDEvcSUmO7awAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:33:11 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id ULj+EfcSUmP/eQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:33:11 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F53516BCD for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:33:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olimU-0003ji-AZ for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:33:10 -0400 Received: from [::1] (helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oliiH-0007SV-3J for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:28:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oliiE-0007Qi-3f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:28:46 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oliiC-0006aL-G2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:28:45 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD427240026 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:28:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1666322922; bh=1DT3MQN8ij1f7F816MUFNytlh9NUb9E57CIUD9XZjQo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=CKqI3aNsNIAhnV2t9joLQcUdph3wyQqvCs0IHw8i589UXV3+JBSEkNiGNbcTbpPb4 v53STvHmQruNDXH9rzBgBtZdtyEt5nlAmpuyCpXPju3rZA78DFJVJASa6ytN+J8uOZ 5sl9TPl6XqjINM05FUfs6BGLBeCrY/KIARQxcvOtQCPFmHq4SFmjoDSKQe1Kzp7yLM OavJgC+Ui23ZV01UIjVuGsgUCf1h0KT9dV7uMf2GQoD97VW39VnzBRgT5BB1PrXSdF EwyPSdBrpT1Cn60n8JDGNneOkq1Ngbq1cosXlRTCpm/n6dqOTx5yh3lwVuINaTHWEQ A0zbhlTCkFMcA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MtqgY48bDz6tm6; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:28:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Max Nikulin Cc: pquessev@gmail.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Error during PDF export but the PDF file is exported In-Reply-To: <98da3e0e-21d1-d342-ae20-5bd9887b668f@gmail.com> References: <82sfwkknm5.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1tgnji2.fsf@localhost> <821qr6n7ue.fsf@gmail.com> <871qr6r7op.fsf@localhost> <82zgdsno6w.fsf@gmail.com> <87a65sazch.fsf@localhost> <82lepbohfc.fsf@gmail.com> <871qr39iyg.fsf@localhost> <98da3e0e-21d1-d342-ae20-5bd9887b668f@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 03:29:26 +0000 Message-ID: <87a65p7t2h.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1666323191; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=DaICEnBl45n5L08QbxtNeN+6djpTpXsSWdRP0HjzBEM=; b=Mwcak7zC2+1TV64gdOSbfyoGXT3t1KMUvTr1RyqwEEvfFRDQpMCvI/FEdzFwXCQOn6sktT XUcGBVlvdOqEKdk1PAzl/MGpRCaQgxe2vv+O5vobAjBrsYllUsVfhrtp1Nr/vLZ2JbRbqW SOzfAvaKlz7793eIvngXKA7QCRcEVc3BaSw3EpksfYdelPoOVX2NM5wWCXPE95EoduvVGU hxrRM1j7Xv+DqJMc3wfGNkDtc9/8MKshT4NL9AE+LqtyzriYJ5VtDsaoXxGGnHfSxmZSP1 HE84rowjKiFkd3UI1eC2V7+bT3HOgjmn/r24HUYbvX+bAZAmmCvxr0RutjV7ow== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1666323191; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RsPyYQFNRt2jD0JBuigvdENJ7aAlSD5sf3/gf9RLPR9tt8qyKEkPomUEXkBp2AutK8/GRY XZE0IMSoakPJ5gEq+vbfBKdMalO6b0NJyZSxg92enNDKyIJ/CIc8bfhh2bsJaJp6CkAxQe /eQnK2eWxmfUaDxu6LGuS1dRg29gRwAE5pnkobaakQ6nlsf74rI/Y0T9ZmSgVq5A6kxNvv jcBL/V3iw5UGagPywamlybqXL3Qf/qgpyqCQi+e4+9Tn1+wZ7hQuCG4lNL93jX6u7T8LFW H42XH7quiJcglBlq8cypQJa9FtTGkpc3kF+ZLhAwxc9ubmRABkuCNZjT6TXfew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=CKqI3aNs; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.44 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=CKqI3aNs; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1F53516BCD X-Spam-Score: -5.44 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: DdQ0b/6z/TRk Max Nikulin writes: > On 20/10/2022 12:12, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >> >> What I wanted to say is that >> `current-time' is good enough if we export to local file. > > Since the patch was not posted to the mailing list, I may be wrong due > to some rather wild assumption. > > Paul Eggert convinced me that generally it is a bad idea to compare wall > (system) time and file time. They may have different resolution or may > have significant offset. Notice that the following pending patch > modifies time handling in `org-compile-file', however I have not tested > it for remote files: > > Max Nikulin. [PATCH v2] org-macs.el: Do not compare wall time and file > modification time. Sun, 9 Oct 2022 15:18:04 +0700. > https://list.orgmode.org/thu03t$16vt$1@ciao.gmane.io > > I am sorry that I did not join to this thread earlier. You are right, that patch should fix this problem as well. For some reason, I only remembered that patch as something that concerns tangling. Now, applied. Pascal, could you please try the latest main and see if the problem is fixed? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at