From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Jackson Subject: Re: Re: patch: link to the log of an ERC session Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:43:14 +0000 Message-ID: <878x29hmml.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> References: <87k5mh4tn0.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <87d4s92msq.fsf@grepfind.mwolson.org> <87sl143adg.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <30FEEE51-7F9F-4CC6-A64B-F8B1814C3A9B@gmail.com> <87odblh9o6.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <87zluyq2g8.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <871w83cd77.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JJY0u-0007Dz-Mi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:43:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JJY0t-0007D7-Sg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:43:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJY0t-0007Ck-K8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:43:19 -0500 Received: from c.painless.aaisp.net.uk ([81.187.30.53]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JJY0t-0007Qq-S6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:43:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871w83cd77.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:53:32 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: org-mode mailing list , Carsten Dominik Chaps, Bastien writes: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I would really appreciate if people can test this out and give >> feedback - I would like to include this file with Org-mode, but I am >> not an irc/erc user myself. > > I've been testing it and it works fine. The patch below does this: [...] > - when point is after ERC prompt, don't add this as a string for > contextual search, since such a search won't produce the right result. I'm not sure that will produce the right result either in that case. What about if I changed it to link to the line above (if there isn't one then just the file)? > Thanks for this add-on No problemo :) [...] Cheers, Phil -- Phil Jackson http://www.shellarchive.co.uk