From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:57:44 +0800 Message-ID: <878wi9bvbv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87prbqmjro.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r5w2mhs3.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <5769.1248703484@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVYvJ-00069M-5P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:44:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MVYvE-00068k-Ep for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:44:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56365 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MVYvE-00068h-9t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:43:56 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.249]:16798) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MVYvD-0001J1-QL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:43:56 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1464125rvb.6 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:43:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5769.1248703484@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:04:44 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > Indeed. BTW, I was curious to see what PortableApps did/looked like, and > (since I couldn't find an installation package for Linux) I downloaded > the sources and looked at them: this thing seems to be Windoze only > (maybe Mac too?) - is that true or did I overlook something? To me that's true - I was a bit surprised too. Mmhh... maybe the Windows user-base is bigger than the Emacs user-base? > PS. And if so, shouldn't the FTC come after them for false advertising? > PortableApps indeed :-) :) -- Bastien