From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: :cache documentation patch Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:47:25 -0700 Message-ID: <878vyyfxgo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fwt7mhg7.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43668 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pahn4-0001Xr-So for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:49:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pahn3-0005wW-ND for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:49:34 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:52606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pahn3-0005wM-KY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:49:33 -0500 Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so7183123yxl.0 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:49:33 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: Org Mode Hi Tom, Yes, the commit is important, this method actually shares all of your commit, including the author information and the commit message. I do this outside of magit, I tend to go to the magit buffer to make sure everything looks ok, then do M-! and type in the command line manually. I'm not sure what the magit way of doing this would be, but the "D" method you described doesn't generate the same type of output file as does git format-patch. Thanks -- Eric "Thomas S. Dye" writes: > Hi Eric, > > Will do. The earlier patch was made with magit. I used the d > command, Diff working tree, then saved the output to the file I sent. > > If I understand correctly, the missing step was the commit. I should > be able to follow a commit with the D command in magit, starting at > HEAD~1 and ending with HEAD. Then save the resulting buffer to > foo.patch, right? > > Or, is it better to do this outside magit so the results don't pass > through an emacs buffer on their way to disk? > > All the best, > Tom > > On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Eric Schulte wrote: > >> Applied, Thanks -- Eric >> >> p.s. would you mind submitting git formatted patches for these sort of >> updates in the future? It greatly simplifies the process of >> applying the patch. The process for creating a git formatted >> patch >> is as follows... >> >> 1. commit your changes to your local copy of the org-mode >> repository >> 2. run the following command to wrap up the latest commit on your >> local copy of the repository into a file which can be attached >> to email messages >> >> git format-patch -o ~/Desktop/ HEAD~1 >> >> after the command finished you will notice a new file on your >> Desktop with a name like 0001-commit-message-stuff.patch >> >> Thanks Again -- Eric >> >> "Thomas S. Dye" writes: >> >>> Aloha all, >>> >>> The attached patch documents the behavior of the :cache header >>> argument. >>> >>> All the best, >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >>> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode