From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Using orgmode to take "inline notes" for research
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:24:09 +0200
Message-ID: <878vvau09y.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinQL4ejv4C9NqinmiYghH6FjNCrmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTin4JJ4=s=vbmXw0rjW9G3py+ZEHiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi===3F6oV7bhKYVxiddhnCri-PLZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=KfD4FWbfF6Qj1yfKC_YGd0hmZ6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<80bp0iquxw.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<BANLkTin3W4n5+YxbWam41AVW-ei32-gQTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinRZDT+74Kvyxe3hjK0FLnfJqMqZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikZJMH8D7Og1bHD1_-9SL1d=7A7WQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<80lizkxy6j.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<BANLkTimN6+=Z1PAFpun2Z_B_0nWCwd187Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42427)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QAzrh-0007hd-5Y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 03:24:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QAzrg-0001AU-Ab
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 03:24:21 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:60916)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QAzrg-0001AO-5h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 03:24:20 -0400
Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so3363647wyf.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimN6+=Z1PAFpun2Z_B_0nWCwd187Q@mail.gmail.com> (John
	Hendy's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:30:07 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:

> ,---
> | (latex "\\todo[inline]{\\textbf{\\textsf{%s %s}}\\linebreak{} %s}"
> |                '((unless (eq todo "")
> |                    (format "\\textsc{%s%s}" todo priority))
> |                  heading content))
> `---
>
> A couple questions:
> - would you be able to even broadly tell me what the latex chunk is
> doing there? Is %s like the %s in python (and perhaps other
> programming languages)? I don't get where the third %s gets its value.
> In other words, it seems that one of them is the heading value and
> another is the content... but what does the third %s get it's value in
> the first line?

First %s will be replaced by the result of '((unless (eq todo "") ...)).
In other words, it will be the empty string or "\\textsc{todo-keyword
priority}". Second %s is the heading text. Third one is the contents of
the inline task.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou