From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: foot note / enumeration question
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 10:10:23 +0200
Message-ID: <878vsh9k7k.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <4E0E2FEC.6010606@roklein.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53641)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QcvHa-0008UI-Gw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 04:10:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QcvHY-0007rz-Fb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 04:10:29 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:51170)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QcvHY-0007rv-2f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 04:10:28 -0400
Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so3203780wyg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 01:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E0E2FEC.6010606@roklein.de> (Robert Klein's message of "Fri, 01
	Jul 2011 22:37:00 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Robert Klein <RoKlein@roklein.de>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Robert Klein <RoKlein@roklein.de> writes:

> A file of
>
> #+begin_example
> * Title
>
> This is a text [fn:: the
> 1. footnote] with a footnote.
> #+end_example
>
> begins an enumeration inside the footenote and then
> forgets to close the footnote (which in LaTeX export
> gets closed at the next \section or so).
>
> I'm not sure what the expected behavior should be -- I'd
> obviously prefer no enumerations in footnotes :)  Is there
> a way to specify this in the header, e.g.
> enum-in-footnotes: nil or similar?   Just thinking when
> someone pute literary references in footnotes this could
> be useful (e.g.: [fn:: My fun. pp. 3-5, 12. edition, O'Really,
> 1996. London, New York...] )

This confusing case shouldn't happen, unless the user somehow does it on
purpose. Indeed, Org prevents auto-filling to break a line where it
would create a new list item.

This looks to me as a false problem ; I don't think we should write some
workaround for it.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou