From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 23:39:38 +0930
Message-ID: <878vh5s8nx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <20120308070825.947091FDE8@saturn.ch.ristopher.com>
	<87haw8mf1r.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ipgmkc3y.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20120429110535.956AE20268@saturn.ch.ristopher.com>
	<87ipgfdcfr.fsf@gnu.org> <87obq5611b.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<871un1ih3j.fsf@gnu.org> <87ehr1mnez.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87y5p6r6ys.fsf@altern.org> <877gwqfwxu.fsf@gmail.com>
	<871umyfvin.fsf@gnu.org> <87txzuegkv.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87sjfdd968.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46928)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1SR29t-0002BG-Cf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 10:09:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1SR29r-0008Qg-PX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 10:09:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87sjfdd968.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Sun, 6 May 2012
	10:07:43 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ((adaptive-fill-function (quote nil)) (adaptive-fill-regexp (quote \(\([
>
> [...]
>
> This looks good.
>
>> It's the same as the previous bug: when I try to debug
>> `org-indent-line-function', the problem disappears.
>
> I pushed another fix: I now rely on the existing org-let
> function, which safely evaluate let constructs.

Bastien,

unfortunately, I still have problems.  I am using org completely up to
date (a few minutes ago).  I do not turn orgstruct++-mode on
automatically at all any more but instead turn it on manually by

  M-x orgstruct++-mode RET

once I'm in a Message buffer.

I tried it just now, replying to your email as my test.  Turned on the
mode, tried to fill the quoted text and it all got mixed up.  Undid
that.  Then went to the bottom and tried to insert a new line and got:

  org-indent-line-function: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'

Turned off orgstruct++-mode (by M-x ... RET again) and filling of quoted
text works fine as does normal writing.

I will try (tomorrow) to isolate this with emacs -Q but my problem is
that my gnus configuration is really really messy and difficult to
isolate.

Thanks,
eric

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.1.50.1
: using Org release_7.8.09-489-g541288