From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: are super-hidden technical blocks required? Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:39:54 -0400 Message-ID: <878vdya22t.fsf@norang.ca> References: <87zk6ea65j.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Swdq4-0008TN-F3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:40:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Swdq2-0008QQ-7s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:40:07 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:48690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Swdq2-0008JP-4Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:40:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zk6ea65j.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:11:52 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Torsten Wagner writes: >> One Idea I had and which was mentioned by Rasmus already too, would be >> to use the same property block but being able to hide certain >> properties >> >> #+ HIDE_PROP: ID, UUID, ODF_PROP, MOBILE_ORG_PROP > > I don't think that moves us into the right direction... > > Let me again suggest that drawers might be extended to have "stops" > which would enable them to unfold from stop to stop instead of just > being fully opened or closed. As long as the "uninteresting" properties > are kept after the last stop, they don't get into the way of normal > operation. Or just use two drawers... PROPERTIES and SYNCDATA (or some other appropriate name) so you unfold the on you care about and leave the other folded. That seems a lot simpler than stops in drawers... Regards, Bernt