From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug] [new exporter] export of inline babel calls confused Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 01:50:56 +0100 Message-ID: <878vablhu7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wqxxqa1e.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWcsM-0005rx-1T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:55:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWcsK-0002mo-WD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:55:13 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:63734) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWcsK-0002mc-Of for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:55:12 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u3so1818920wey.0 for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:55:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87wqxxqa1e.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Thu, 8 Nov 2012 09:45:57 +1030") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: Eric Schulte Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > in trying to see if I could replicate a problem with disappearing src > code blocks, I have run into problems with the new exporter. The > attached minimal example generates a very strange convoluted latex > output (also attached). After a quick glance, it looks like point is moved to the wrong place (it is moved to the headline whereas it should stay near the call) in either `org-babel-exp-src-block' or `org-babel-in-export-file'. You can eval the following snippet to see what is really parsed: (let ((org-current-export-file (current-buffer))) (org-export-block-preprocess)) I'm Cc'ing Eric Schulte in case he finds time to look at the problem. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou