From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-mobile-push vs. symlinks Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:10:10 +0100 Message-ID: <878v8abf1e.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58493) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TqkM7-0005Qy-5T for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:57:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TqkM4-00078u-Mn for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:57:06 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:36605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TqkM4-00078i-GV for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:57:04 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hn3so8529561wib.5 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:57:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (James Harkins's message of "Sat, 8 Dec 2012 11:42:52 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: jamshark70@dewdrop-world.net Cc: "Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hi James, James Harkins writes: > - One should not put symlinks into org-directory, or at least make > sure the symlink's name is the same as the target. If this is an > intentional limitation, it should be documented. > > - Or, the symlink resolution is not actually necessary and it causes > problems. In that case, it's a bug that should be fixed. > > Which is it? :-) I'd say the first one :) -- Bastien