From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: BIND org-html-style-include-* Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:27:21 +0100 Message-ID: <878v6tbaee.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zjz9vnu3.fsf@lapcat.tftorrey.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51999) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5LW0-0004i6-SC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:27:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5LVy-0003w5-SX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:27:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:50058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5LVy-0003vv-Mi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:27:38 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fn15so345398wgb.8 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:27:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zjz9vnu3.fsf@lapcat.tftorrey.com> (T. F. Torrey's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:16:52 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "T.F. Torrey" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, tftorrey@tftorrey.com (T.F. Torrey) writes: > In my files, this used to work to suppress the default styles and > javascript: > > #+BIND: org-export-html-style-include-default nil > #+BIND: org-export-html-style-include-scripts nil > > Now, I have these: > > #+BIND: org-html-style-include-default nil > #+BIND: org-html-style-include-scripts nil > > But they seem to be silently ignored, though if I setq the values ahead > of time, the output is suppressed. > > Can these still be set using BIND? If so, what am I doing wrong? What is the value of `org-export-allow-bind-keywords'? > Also, the value of org-html-mathjax-template seems to be output now by > default, and I don't remember seeing it before. Is this an intended > change? If so, how can it be suppressed? (If not ... ???) I cannot answer you for now, because I don't know enough of the HTML back-end. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou