From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in behavior of M-RET with latest Org-mode
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:07:24 +0100
Message-ID: <878v64csz7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <m2d2vp3tq2.fsf@newartisans.com> <14474.1361770745@alphaville>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34815)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UCCNj-0002HJ-6g
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:07:27 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UCCNg-0000Fc-MP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:07:27 -0500
Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]:40368)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UCCNg-0000FU-CX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:07:24 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id k14so3776652wer.11
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 09:07:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <14474.1361770745@alphaville> (Nick Dokos's message of "Mon, 25
	Feb 2013 00:39:05 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Nick and John,

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> So the heuristic might not be perfect, but it seems to work for
> all but the first headline.

I fixed this and the heuristic should not insert undue blank lines
anymore.  Thanks for confirming,

-- 
 Bastien