From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: latex and bibliography? Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:54:13 +0200 Message-ID: <878v29w7l6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87mwqriir0.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5aavint.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <87r4g25fmw.fsf@pank.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40725) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoTLG-0006a0-Bo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:55:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoTLE-0006qD-Sm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:55:06 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoTLE-0006p5-MF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:55:04 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoTLD-0004wC-Cl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:55:03 +0200 Received: from g231104022.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.104.22]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:55:03 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by g231104022.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:55:03 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Nick Dokos writes: >> I don't know much about references and bibliographies in org (there have >> been some discussions recently on the list I think but I haven't >> followed them), but AFAIK the \bibliography stuff is just text as far as >> org is concerned and is passed verbatim to the output file. It just >> happens that when the output file is processed through latex and >> friends, they can make some sense out of it. The rest of the world (org >> included and all its exporters) remains blissfully ignorant - that's my >> story in any case and until somebody proves me wrong, I'm sticking with >> it. > > It's pretty much true. There's a org-bibtex or an ox-bibtex. Neither > work to my satisfaction. The best solution that I've tried is still > links (there was a new solutions posed recently (on github) and > there's Zotero-integration as well, which I haven't tried). Using > \cite{.} directly is frail as it can break over lines. I see, thanks! -- cheers, Thorsten