From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug: wrong type argument exporting
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:13:00 +0100
Message-ID: <878uwrz9ir.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <CAJcAo8v8pyunFC0K4pD8QDNq=BUth0Zzm470sywHrducL2Bfng@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35978)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Vgs38-0001Sg-DQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 03:13:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Vgs2z-00043W-MU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 03:13:14 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]:38464)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Vgs2z-00043R-G8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 03:13:05 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hi5so1197265wib.13
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:13:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJcAo8v8pyunFC0K4pD8QDNq=BUth0Zzm470sywHrducL2Bfng@mail.gmail.com>
	(Samuel Wales's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:31:38 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Samuel,

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:

> This also actually corrupts the buffer by inserting footnotes at the
> end.  Sometimes it leaves it in a narrowed state.

Can you give hints on how to reproduce this?

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien