From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: Latex Export Difficulties
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:39:31 +0100
Message-ID: <878utoqut8.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <BLU0-SMTP3539D7B999CA0658378762E8B940@phx.gbl>
	<87sirws9ux.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36825)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1WBODj-0004d8-TW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 07:38:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1WBODe-00088u-HY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 07:38:19 -0500
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:65500)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1WBODe-00088f-6x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 07:38:14 -0500
Received: from x200s ([192.167.90.133]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with
	ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlE86-1VcbhN1lSA-00b2Ge for
	<emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:38:11 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87sirws9ux.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Thu, 6
	Feb 2014 12:29:10 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk, eagleeye777@hotmail.de
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

> Samuel Schaumburg <eagleeye777@hotmail.de> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> What I learned from my research is that the line has to look like this,
>> so that I can compile:
>>
>> \section{Some Headline \protect\footnote{S. 45}}
>>
>> This case is quite typicall for me and leads to often manually reworking
>> the tex buffer for quite a while, which is not very convenient.
>>
>> Is there any way I can set up the org latex export to do this
>> automatically. Would greatly help my workflow. I am quite a newbie to
>> emacs-lisp, so I cannot think of how to do this. Maybe someone can help
>> me here
>
> Not an org solution per se but you could redefine \footnote to do what
> you want.  The example below/attached seems to work.  I have no idea if
> it breaks the usage of footnote in other places, mind you.
>
> * Testing redefinition of footnote
> #+latex: \let\origfootnote\footnote
> #+latex: \renewcommand{\footnote}{\protect\origfootnote}
> ** Subheading [fn:1: Which has a very interesting footnote]
> This is some really boring text because all the interesting stuff is in t=
he footnote.

Try to add a TOC to this document.  It's probably not what you want.=20

Another LaTeX hack would be to do something like:

   \def\myhead{My heading}
   \section[\myhead]{\myhead\footnote{My foot}}

This is such an awkward construct that it should probably just
relegated to a filter.

=E2=80=93Rasmus

--=20
May contains speling mistake