From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Morgan <tlm@ziiuu.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: unconverted dashes in HTML export
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:33:44 +0100
Message-ID: <878utj71mv.fsf@azha.ziiuu.com>
References: <87d2iykpwo.fsf@azha.ziiuu.com> <87ha8aymst.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56365)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tlm@ziiuu.com>) id 1WCquk-0008Ta-R2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:28:54 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tlm@ziiuu.com>) id 1WCqud-0007J9-Gf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:28:46 -0500
Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:65113)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tlm@ziiuu.com>) id 1WCqud-0007Ir-9q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:28:39 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id hr13so4846485lab.29
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:28:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87ha8aymst.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sat, 08
	Feb 2014 10:29:54 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi, Nicolas,

> The new regexps still don't look right, as they can match an additional
> dash:
>
>   (string-match "---\\([^-]?\\)" "----") => 0
>
> I'm not sure about the intent of this regexp, that is whether
> consecutive mdashes or ndashes are allowed or not.
>
> A correct version could be either:
>
>   ("---" . "&#x2014;")
>
> or
>
>   ("\\([^-]\\|^\\)---\\([^-]\\|$\\)" . "\\1&#x2014;\\2")
>
> I think the former is on par with LaTeX behaviour.

Good point, and I don't see any problem with your first version,
though I don't understand the intent behind the original regexp,
either.  I had assumed the point was to avoid matching horizontal
separator lines in tables, but that doesn't seem to be an issue.

Thanks,
Thomas