From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jorge.a.alfaro@gmail.com (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo) Subject: Re: Repeat work / week days Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:40:16 -0400 Message-ID: <878up6f34f.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zjhm86uw.fsf@gmail.com> <87vbsacb1o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wu2cb-0004u7-2G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:40:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wu2cU-00015z-Pq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:40:33 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wu2cU-00015m-JM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:40:26 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wu2cR-0004mp-Q6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:40:23 +0200 Received: from nat-130-132-173-153.central.yale.edu ([130.132.173.153]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:40:23 +0200 Received: from jorge.a.alfaro by nat-130-132-173-153.central.yale.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:40:23 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > This is not valid syntax. A given headline cannot have more than one > SCHEDULED entry attached to it. Even if it works (I didn't test), > I wouldn't count on it: this is a bug. I guess if you do not plan to do start working on the task you should not put the SCHEDULED and just a simple timestamp. But if you plan to work on a task every day of the week, why shouldn't you be able to do it this way? It does work, btw. Is it because it can conflict with changing TODO states? Also related, if you want it to repeat in your agenda only for a certain period, look at org-class. For example, while I was a student I had used things like #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp %%(org-class 2013 1 7 2013 4 27 2) 12:00pm-01:15pm The name of the class %%(org-class 2013 1 7 2013 4 27 4) 12:00pm-01:15pm The name of the class #+END_SRC for classes that were Tuesday and Thursday. It was also under a single headline. Is this, or several simple timestamps under a single headline also bad syntax? Best, Jorge.