From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: babel python example not reproducible Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:02:38 -0400 Message-ID: <878uou2cn3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87egyox566.fsf@gmail.com> <53A02C7D.4020202@easy-emacs.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WxMLt-0002fe-Rf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:21:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WxMLn-0002Gb-Ow for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:21:01 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a]:48462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WxMLn-0002GU-KP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:20:55 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id dc16so1190061qab.29 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:20:55 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Hi Guys, > > please permit a comment after some times - it's just not to create > heroes :) > > IMHO the complexity orb-babel took by creating its own slots for > symbols like function names, variables etc. is not to handle reliably > across the languages. > I don't understand what you mean by the above. > > A net and simple way out would be just to employ commands delivered by > existing Emacs modes on org-source sections. Inserting the results > might be provided by a hook. > This is what Org-mode does when possible, and this is why some language modes are both much simpler and much more reliable than others, e.g., because of Emacs' excellent support for common lisp ob-lisp.el is both shorter and provides higher quality support than ob-python.el. $ wc -l lisp/ob-{lisp,python}.el 111 lisp/ob-lisp.el 346 lisp/ob-python.el If I've miss-understood the above please clarify. Thanks, Eric > > Cheers, > > Andreas > > > > > -- Eric Schulte https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte PGP: 0x614CA05D (see https://u.fsf.org/yw)