From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: unattractive list spacing in ox-html export
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:24:11 +0200
Message-ID: <878uoml9tw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87tx7bgzdy.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwd3bbgl.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<87oaxjfgce.fsf@gmail.com> <loom.20140624T143755-486@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40290)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1WzQug-0000dL-7l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:37:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1WzQuZ-0006AD-7R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:37:30 -0400
Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.86]:42348)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1WzQuY-00069x-W6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:37:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <loom.20140624T143755-486@post.gmane.org> (Achim Gratz's message
	of "Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:46:41 +0000 (UTC)")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@NexGo.DE>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@NexGo.DE> writes:

> You can disagree all you want, that doesn't make the underlying problem go
> away.  The reason for the "unattractive spacing" is that list items, while
> conceptually paragraphs, do not have additional spacing after them so the
> list becomes more compact.  The W3C doesn't really encourage to use lists
> with paragraphs, but if you do (like Org), an explicit paragraph inside a
> list environment either should also not have that spacing or should have it
> at the beginning (in which case the first paragraph must be implicit).  So
> you'll have to modify the CSS anyway or the lists are still having ugly
> spacing. Your patch only makes it consistently ugly as soon as there is a
> single explicit paragraph needed.

So, would a better solution be to remove the patch and tweak default CSS
so it provides better spacing for paragraphs in <li> tags?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou