From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEhlcmUgaXMgYSBwYXRjaCBJIHdhbnQgdG8gYWRkIHRvIG9y?=
 =?UTF-8?B?Zy5lbOKApuKApg==?=
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:55:44 +0100
Message-ID: <878ufjpcvz.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <54ED4E97.C3CC91.30527@m12-13.163.com>
	<87d24yb0u1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<54F0118E.D911F7.27458@m12-15.163.com>
	<olulhjjg0sa.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<87mw3z8z08.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<olu4mq7pe81.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49375)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YRNGg-0000wY-RX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:55:59 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YRNGd-0000P6-I8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:55:58 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50663)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YRNGd-0000OZ-Bl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:55:55 -0500
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YRNGa-0004mC-UW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:55:53 +0100
Received: from ip5b4025d5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([91.64.37.213])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:55:52 +0100
Received: from rasmus by ip5b4025d5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:55:52 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:

> I am talking about `org-toggle-latex-fragment'.  And even if that is
> fast, it is very annoying behaviour.  I'd very much like to be able to
> toggle individual images.  In a math-heavy document the redisplay of all
> formula images of even the current section takes noticable moment.  But
> much worse: if I am working on a formula, I usually like to see other
> formulas as images.  But they disappear as soon as I switch off the
> image of the current formula to debug it.
>
> It is quite hard to even achieve the state where all formulas except the
> formula under the point are displayed as image.
>
> And I'd expect `org-toggle-latex-fragment' to do what its name suggests:
> to toggle the latex fragment, i.e. to produce the same state after the
> second invocation.  Similarly to visibility cycling only a prefix should

Wouldn't the "correctᵀᴹ" behavior be to show the latex-code "under" the
image if point is at image.  Like in AUCTeX?  [I don't know if it's easily
feasible to have similar behavior].

Personally, I never use org-toggle-latex-fragment, but rely on entities,
since org-toggle-latex-fragment is only really good for "static/mature"
documents.

—Rasmus

-- 
And I faced endless streams of vendor-approved Ikea furniture. . .