From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:27:20 +0100 Message-ID: <878uffaskn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87ioezooi2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw4bpaiu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761aznpiq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87twyjnh0r.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oaopx24e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87k2zd4f3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpkv8g9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <877fv6xfaq.fsf@gmail.com> <87twya2ak0.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj81aa97.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87ioep2r6p.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4ngbgm7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twy39qt2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87pp8rb1i3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnkbrver.fsf@gmx.us> <87h9u3avtu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twy3qbbj.fsf@gmx.us> <87d24rauik.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pp8r0zm2.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59041) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSZj3-0006oV-W7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:26:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSZj0-0007w1-NC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:26:13 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:55647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSZj0-0007vi-GI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:26:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pp8r0zm2.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:05:25 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > So (citation =E2=8B=AF :parts ((part =E2=8B=AF) (part =E2=8B=AF))). Fine= with me. Other > possibilities are citation/entry and :entries. Or less nice: > citation/cite and :cites. I don't mind using :entries and `entry' either. I'll update "wip-cite" in a few days. > It would enable "complicated argument [@k1;@k2;@k3]", which is pretty > nice. There's still no pre and post notes etc, only keys. Shortcuts are simple citations that ought to be available in most back-ends. I don't see your example as a particularly straightforward one. I suggest to use [(cite):@k1;@k2;@k3] Note that your example doesn't even provide an in-text equivalent while [@k1] has @k1. Regards,