From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Config best practices? Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:56:25 -0400 Message-ID: <878ueqzeyu.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87r3sk1q56.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <86pp843uly.fsf@example.com> <87oannntpg.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87h9tfyrrg.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <86619uzs9v.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47015) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZIxF-000752-HE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:56:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZIx9-00077S-Vl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:56:41 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZIx9-00077L-Oi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:56:35 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YZIx6-0002fj-Ca for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:56:32 +0100 Received: from pool-108-7-223-120.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.7.223.120]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:56:32 +0100 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-7-223-120.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:56:32 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastien Vauban writes: >>>> I can tell you they aren't isomorphic... The noexport tag simply says >>>> "don't export this subtree". The COMMENT keyword adds "don't run any >>>> Babel code block in there". >> >> COMMENT also says that the whole subtree is not to be exported according >> to the doc: >> >> (info "(org) Comment lines") >> >> Has that changed? > > Nope, it hasn't: I wrote that COMMENT *adds* "don't run any code" to > "don't export this subtree either". So, we're both on the same > frequency. > Ah, sorry: I misunderstood. -- Nick