From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: bug#18870: bug#18870: \emsp and alignment in org clock report Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:44:51 +0100 Message-ID: <878ueo1zcc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <544f71eb.0aadc20a.595f.70e0@mx.google.com> <1426142440.1635596.239250013.1BC7F573@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87sid31gcs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20150317214758.GE19234@benfinney.id.au> <87oanr1do8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <1296089020.23116290.1426713020569.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <621838154.36797.1426800834828.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <87bnjm4tly.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZnfC-0004Av-0Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:44:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZnf8-0005W5-N2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:44:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZnf8-0005W1-JQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YZnf7-0004Rd-VH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 17:44:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87bnjm4tly.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:55:53 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Ufimtsev Cc: Ben Finney , Subhan Michael Tindall , 18870@debbugs.gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > The trick could be to use an Org entity which is as large as its > overlay. Even better if that entity is readable without that overlay. > I'll look into it soon. This should now be fixed. The markup used is more readable and doesn't alter table alignment.