From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Incomplete org-plus-contrib Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:33:10 +0200 Message-ID: <878ucigqzd.fsf@gmx.us> References: <84a8wzocj5.fsf@gmail.com> <87pp5vmw71.fsf@gmx.us> <84617no4v3.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvNn2-0003vv-Gb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 06:33:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvNmw-0006w1-V9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 06:33:24 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvNmw-0006vY-NI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 06:33:18 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YvNmv-00010Z-Cw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:33:17 +0200 Received: from 46.166.190.188 ([46.166.190.188]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:33:17 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 46.166.190.188 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:33:17 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: bzg@gnu.org Marco Wahl writes: > Rasmus writes: > >>> IIUC org-eww is missing because it is not included in branch 'maint'. >>> Possibly it is a good idea to put org-eww there. >> >> In the lisp folder, maint is typically for bug fixes. I guess for contrib >> it's more flexible. > > So would you recommend to copy org-eww to branch maint...contrib/lisp/? Good question. It kind of defies stable, but again, I don't think the promise of stable necessarily extend to contrib. Let's see what Bastien says. —Rasmus -- May contains speling mistake