From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix tangling in indirect buffers
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:40:10 +0200
Message-ID: <878u8fddnp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <m2zj12bifc.fsf@krugs.de> <87vbbq2qah.fsf@kyleam.com>
	<m2bndeaa6w.fsf@krugs.de> <87613knt5h.fsf_-_@kyleam.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57713)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZZdhw-0000xO-OS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 07:38:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZZdhv-00062N-WF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 07:38:32 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:34054)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZZdhv-00062E-Qe
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 07:38:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87613knt5h.fsf_-_@kyleam.com> (Kyle Meyer's message of "Tue, 08
	Sep 2015 23:55:22 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Helo,

Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:

> Patch against maint attached.

LGTM. Thank you.

> -	 (file (buffer-file-name))
> +	 (file (buffer-file-name (buffer-base-buffer)))

I think there are some occurrences like this one in the code base that
should be fixed during some rainy day.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou