From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Shrink columns dynamically Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:59:41 +0200 Message-ID: <878tjwuhxe.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87bmoswkvs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d198uznu.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87o9ss4aj4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87inj0m5v5.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUfmU-0001Gp-7Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:59:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUfmT-0001BQ-5r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:59:46 -0400 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::194]:32777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUfmS-0001B6-W4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:59:45 -0400 Received: from saiph.selenimh (000043010000000000000469.ipv6.commingeshautdebit.fr [IPv6:2a03:a0a0:0:4301::469]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E53FC5A60 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:59:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ngz by saiph.selenimh with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dUfmP-0006WY-4J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:59:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87inj0m5v5.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:47:26 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Uwe Brauer writes: > I just was faced with a table which just contained 3 columns but very > many rows. In second column however was very wide, it contained titled > of journals. So 'cutting' them to half was sufficient to identify them > but allowed me to see the third column. So I say narrowing and hiding > are two useful features. I would not say one can substitute the other. > Hiding is useful if I have very many small columns but narrowing for > very wide columns. > > > So please do not remove narrowing. There is much overlapping between the two features. I'd rather implement so sort of narrowing using shrunk columns than have the two features in the code base. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou