From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Cross Subject: Re: [OT] nobody (none) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:53:20 +1100 Message-ID: <878taev9rz.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Z7V-0000Rk-Ku for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:53:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Z7U-0001yy-Tx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:53:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pl0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]:41193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0Z7U-0001yT-Na for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:53:32 -0400 Received: by mail-pl0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b7-v6so12707847plr.8 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 13:53:32 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Roger Mason Cc: Org-Mode This would appear to be gnus specific. I use mu4e and have not noticed anything along these lines. Suggest a gnus specific list might be the go. Tim Roger Mason writes: > Hello, > > An off topic problem. I'm asking here because I noticed this problem > first in this list, but it has spread. > > I read e-mail using gnus (v5.13) in emacs (25.3.1) on FreeBSD (10.3). > Some months ago I noticed some messages in this list displaying with > sender 'nobody' and subject '(none)' in gnus. As the months have passed > the number of such messages has increased many-fold and spread to other > lists. On opening the offending e-mail it is usual that the message has > both sender and subject fields with plausible contents. Often, but not > exclusively, the 'nobody' messages originate from gmail accounts. > > I have not changed any settings at my end so I assume some commonly used > component of the chain of email applications has changed settings and > that I need to respond to that change. But where? and what? > > Any hints on where to look would be most helpful. > > Again, sorry for the OT message. > > Roger -- Tim Cross