From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id sDrTN/MsrGX8KwEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:28:36 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id sDrTN/MsrGX8KwEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:28:35 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=a6aGwC56; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705782515; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=yobIlBK4DEnUGjWTPlKPc9SVHx0jl0pcUDueNS4X+eA=; b=ESu2CTMVPmRss5zk51jaCVn75y3moahcSYzVZG1nqYfyC+FZM4ZVX2/NBptHNlY560z97f c50akgGsFzg527QyscDMjyjaLu5Sr+tF9IymEBFHe7Q1a4m3dVKfiRgnlJn9fnoiiNy18M c5HLwUROwpzBOwqu8IXtWQfVcz1/D1QdTByWCrosrf/FjPJeWW9UN9x49Z7JXau8Tt58zm uYzVCvDX66/mxe8KfR3WWjJeHy2vsbri1Sd6K3wz5LD4z04pO05Zs04eGEd9/f9Gp1jMK0 Y1Y1+044ULAnWaqkgX41QxXq4r7F2fEFr4RkcDIsAGcJObUdGHrTgiF8pYBjaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=a6aGwC56; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705782515; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=JYRTKagQehj6vsrvMKAkpJqhm6v38YG2NkTc4GLIvs0tN+FFQCSbP1ahr1nGOxaL9wCbK0 UfmZJkdCQ43JVKZh4F33pxM4Fzi7TXVa8xsERzAUTK2bdrxnd4tKVNsVRTZvWU2lTVK0yk oABWH/xZncrfoWALSLOgm8+2HAR98Hql47BnY/Gw92+kJDWqcpNcJOacaea3Tj7U4ME+wj CfIyIdGNKKxNjHhhJ5bgIBwJBNH/nDTjC5/J0EQKrKd/ocs/rdJ+kjM4EIUnFXomk3FMOv UKAW3CFnV64gXWMGg3yr2URPyn7NE/cIgPkqx6Wq+wSZQB1YwU77oJF8xEyzjA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF621D467 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:28:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHwQ-0006kH-Dt; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:27:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHwO-0006k7-VY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:27:44 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRHwM-0005e9-Pe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:27:44 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5DE240028 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:27:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1705782458; bh=PrRU1zsDLJqSMxcFP9c+EygzZ41hhJCH2TBdTNQU9/w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=a6aGwC56cMC8HrTssk7K2piPw43zQJZnkHg02XMUuASzGIHWTdkmxipwbbMFvYDGn akxQxL24ic9hIBiRx555MwSYplZtDhtHKlpFMbnWZ/5rTwqyLBk6lNkq8sVGxELgMB 3WM31MXQbLHYQLcQRTigqjIGt43IBVdhgv0WuJiJoJKb4HPsvmOLpG/rVZodk4nlvC pVlIn1CkQhQfhdfwkEBllVzL1mxFcOm58V/SUquWmJ33l78aipDkxsCfphHgzFa1QM 05Q/2qDJcai2DcGcaelEMa1LM83tc6C8ZaOp1uPBkBQ+LMgOHp3MPt29jeS2RsFr9S Hr4E+D7Oct16g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4THShn3Zz2z9rxB; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 21:27:37 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: Ihor Radchenko Cc: orgmode , Max Nikulin Subject: Re: [possible patch] Remove the '\\[0pt]' string from the last line of a verse block in LaTeX export In-Reply-To: <875xzn6dw3.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:47:08 +0000") References: <874jfvjo2k.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu5uv7c.fsf@localhost> <878r4tfccn.fsf@posteo.net> <87zfx9t7di.fsf@localhost> <87wmsddlw5.fsf@posteo.net> <87r0ikrt5h.fsf@localhost> <87o7dnefwo.fsf@posteo.net> <87cyu1l69f.fsf@localhost> <87il3tax9a.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uwjerg.fsf@localhost> <87o7dju9vn.fsf@posteo.net> <8734uuaj11.fsf@localhost> <87h6j96xn5.fsf@posteo.net> <871qac6v5j.fsf@localhost> <87o7dgf8bb.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7dg5d8f.fsf@localhost> <87frysf1wf.fsf@posteo.net> <875xzn6dw3.fsf@localhost> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:27:35 +0000 Message-ID: <878r4jg37s.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.40 X-Spam-Score: -7.40 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6FF621D467 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: vexoKl1YQAuR Ihor Radchenko writes: > I see your point. > Although I am still a bit hesitant to remove > `org-latex-line-break-safe'. > What would be the benefit of removing it? For now, I mostly just see > that it will make the life harder for users in Scenario B. It's a complicated situation, because we now have two solutions to the same problem... It certainly sounds a bit abrupt to remove org-latex-line-break-safe (at least for now). I see no problem in both solutions coexisting. After all, the user can always give an "\\\\" value to org-latex-line-break-safe. The other possibility is that org-latex-line-break-safe is selectively deleted, as you mentioned in a previous email. In tables and verse blocks, unless I'm missing something, I think adding [0pt] would be unnecessary, with the new solution. > For verse blocks, AFAIU, even \\ is problematic. (Correct me if I am wrong) >From the tests I have done, the problem of the vertical space being altered after the verse environment only appears when the last line ends in \\[0pt]. If it ends in \\ the problem does not appear. It is not recommended that a verse environment ends in \\, but it does not seem to influence the output. In fact, that was how it was in Org in the days pre org-latex-line-break-safe and there were never any problems. Best regards, Juan Manuel