From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org>
Subject: Re: Spreadsheet question
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:49:53 +0100
Message-ID: <877i6gcizy.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>
References: <87abbdc58q.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>
	<6BD7F784-D3F6-4953-9156-11A9F3136B72@uva.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L8BmS-0003i3-LI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:50:00 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L8BmR-0003hk-4L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:50:00 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55427 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L8BmR-0003hb-0O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:49:59 -0500
Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]:6997)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <tassilo@member.fsf.org>) id 1L8BmQ-0001j7-K2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:49:58 -0500
In-Reply-To: <6BD7F784-D3F6-4953-9156-11A9F3136B72@uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's
	message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:06:18 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:

Hi Carsten,

> @-1 references the row above the current.  If that is a hline, if
> actually references the current line.

Yes, I see that, but I wonder if that's actually the right thing to do.
IMO defaulting to some cell/row/column which is not referenced correctly
might obscure wrong formulas.

For example, in my case the first calculation gave 2 which is correct
and only the second recalculation shows me that the forumla is wrong.
So I'd prefer an #ERROR if a reference doesn't exist.

Bye,
Tassilo