From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: BUG-#+ Fontification Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:14:10 -0400 Message-ID: <877i0017r1.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> References: <87octd2cql.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <751104C9-F496-4C28-AC3A-62E808444651@gmail.com> <87bppc3no1.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <877i003nm4.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <87zlcw281l.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <14307.1243550041@alphaville.usa.hp.com> <87vdnk25qs.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <8298.1243566088@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <10323.1243575183@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MA0OQ-0001hm-2G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:36:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MA0OL-0001fb-G4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:36:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49266 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MA0OL-0001fP-7V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:36:53 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:63314) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MA02j-00008I-DF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:14:34 -0400 Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MA02i-0000l2-Aq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:14:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <10323.1243575183@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Fri\, 29 May 2009 01\:33\:03 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > > Well, duh: because of my PATH, I was getting emacs 22 from the command line, > but emacs 23 from the panel/menu - no wonder there is a difference. > > OTOH, this was stupidity with a purpose :-) The upshot is that > org-compatible-face does not deal with emacs 22 gracefully, since the > first two clauses of the cond fail there and so it takes the default > branch; but since specs is nil in the call, the function returns > nil. > > Bernt, you are on emacs 22, correct? > Yes I'm on emacs 22 (Debian) GNU Emacs 22.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2008-11-09 on raven, modified by Debian Thanks for figuring this out :) -Bernt